Stop Outsourcing Thinking
Stop Outsourcing Your Thinking to Abstractions
Your next production outage won’t be caused by what you know. It will be caused by what your abstractions hid from you. Three days. Five engineers. One memory leak. Zero understanding of the actual system.
This is not a front-end or back-end problem.
It’s a systems problem.
We’ve built an industry of engineers who know tools but not mechanics.
The Abstraction Trap
Abstractions are leverage. Until they become crutches.
I’ve interviewed engineers who can orchestrate Kubernetes but can’t explain how a scheduler works. Who can build data lakes but can’t reason about network partitions. Who can train neural networks but can’t derive a gradient.
They know which button to press, not why it works.
- Using Kafka doesn’t mean you understand distributed messaging.
- Using PyTorch doesn’t mean you understand automatic differentiation.
- Using Terraform doesn’t mean you understand state machines.
Every abstraction layer you adopt without understanding compounds its tax.
First, it takes your performance - hidden latency you’ll never profile. Then your debugging - stack traces through seventeen layers you didn’t write. Then your creativity - solutions bounded by what the tool permits. Finally, your autonomy - when the abstraction fails, you wait for a patch instead of fixing it yourself.
You stop seeing systems. You only see interfaces - someone else’s mental model, frozen in an API. You become an operator of other people’s thoughts, not an engineer of your own.
Reclaiming System Thinking
Before you rely on the abstraction, understand the layer it hides:
- Before Spark, understand distributed computation.
- Before gRPC, understand TCP.
- Before large language models, understand probability and optimization.
This isn’t about rejecting abstractions.
It’s about regaining optionality. Knowing when to bypass, reconfigure, or replace the tool entirely.
Engineering, not just assembling.
Practical Countermeasures
- Rebuild a Core Primitive. Write a toy scheduler, a toy message broker, a toy neural net. Not for production — for comprehension.
- Read Source. Trace one frequently used function to the bottom. See where the magic ends.
- Deliberate Constraint. Solve a problem without the framework first. Add abstraction only if it reduces net complexity.
- Learn the Layer Below. If you run infra, learn operating systems. If you run models, learn math. If you run distributed systems, learn networking.
The Courage to Engineer
Tools want you to be a consumer. Systems thinking demands you be a creator.
Yes, abstractions encode best practices. They prevent classes of errors. They save time. But they also breed helplessness.
When the abstraction fails, do you wait for a patch - or do you peel back the layer and solve the problem yourself?
The best engineers I know are fluent across layers. They work with abstractions, around them, or without them entirely. They understand that every framework, library, and platform is just a snapshot of someone else’s mental model — not a law of physics.
Stop asking, “How do I do this in X?” Start asking, “What is this system really doing?”
Stop outsourcing your thinking.
Tools will change. Systems endure.
When you understand the wheel, you know when to invent the wing.
reach out on x or github or email for more. Note - This is from my perspective and learnings as a founding engineer. This is my personal take on engineering and systems thinking. Not affiliated with any company or my current employer.